
There are many prospects for hiding away carbon- ranging from the practical to the weird and wacky.
At the wackier end of possibilities is and idea-put forward by a scientist at the University of California- to vent CO2 to outer space, using the Earth´s magnetic fields as a conduit. The controversial idea of geo-engineering - planetary-scale engineering- is also a possibility. Concepts include installing giant sunshades in space, spreading tiny particles in the upper atmosphere to block out some of the suns´s rays or blasting seawater droplest into the air to stimulate the formation of refelctive cloud.
The more practrical end of the range of solution involves storing CO2 in existing oil and gas fields: their ability to hold gas indefinitely is already demostrated, the geology or producing fields is well defined and companies have experience of re-injecting gas through enhanced oil recovery operations. And pumping CO2 into an oil reservoir pushes out more oil, so CO2 storage can have the side benefit of producing a valuable commodity.
Alternatively, CO2 can be stored in geological traps that do not contain hydrocarbons, but have similar characteristics to oil or gas bearing structures, or coal seems. The thirdpossibility is aquifers-deep saline reservoirs with no defined structural traps. Although they are less well understood than oil reservoirs, they are much bigger, wich means they will be and important part of the future of CCS.
But CO2 doesn´t have to be stored underground. Alternatives under consideratons include deep-ocean storage, in wich CO2 is dissolved into seawater. Mineral sequestration above ground is another possibility, with CO2 exothermically reacted with natural minerals to form stable carbonates. Another possibility would be to capture CO2 directly from the atmosphere with chemical solvents.